CO129-183 - Public Offices & Others - 1878 — Page 371

this point is one

19.

peculiarly calling for the

decision of the Secretary of State

a

cuaslind policy. If he thinks that in

d.

Sangkara

as alsewhere, the Government

should be nential in veli

religions matters,

Anvisin would have to be

anisling retainers. If..

ltre

on the other hand, he

should decide that, under the car-

cumstances, every

Catitude diall he the teaching, while the

allowest in

subjects of

the standards will alone be

used in the examination of the Schools, the Bishop's amendment could be ac cebled.

The Bishop next suggests

a

school must

distinct

dis-

Itat instead & saying be represented by a bhanager from the teacher, we ahmed pay

tinet

358

tinct from the fand teacher". We then says

that in his schools there are

ers,

aud

C

faid tradi

personal payment to one of the

Christian Brothers of a fourth of the grant

would simply be a

pasir, as

Sa

payment toths So. teaching snecubers of ja valigions

cong.ogatin lave no divided interest.

It would be difficult to

arrange

thing with.

out chipulating that " in Catholic schools.

as hard a the

grant

chall

до

to the teach.

ard: the warle of it shall be paid to the

Superior? As, however, the Bishop ad-

suits that

"

the object of the clause is perfectly clear and perfectly reasonable, thingh inapplicable to his schools. I

timber it might be allowed to stand as it is. The principal teacher in

Catholic school under the Superior would.

got